Dawn May And Misty Hot

Pomigliano

* Adriano Sgrò

The agreement signed in Pomigliano d'Arco is a real injury to the rights enshrined in the constitution, laws that protect the health within the national contract. Well did the CGIL to declare illegal and therefore unenforceable. With this firmly and with the conditions of a real fight at 360 degrees it is necessary that all the CGIL commitments for the coming months.

Pomigliano describes a very dramatic situation. The ignorance of a large industrial group which invests in product and research and continues to stress the conditions and the labor costs to gain competitive advantage.
The trade union situation is so bad, CISL and UIL permanently bent at a model of labor relations and bilateral industrial and institutionalized, and the structure of the project shows that the cartel separate Jan. 22, rejected by the CGIL, threatens to find manifestation in a roundabout way. Area "Job-Company" is committed to supporting, together with the CGIL, the struggle of the metalworkers' bells.
Their struggle is the struggle of one Fiom but it's the fight all over the world of work which opposes the drift liberticide who plan the destruction of welfare state and democracy in the country. Wrestling with the Fiat workers means giving link to our struggle to defend public services, to fight the privatization of the commons, to prevent the cancellation of the state sociale.In this direction, we need to affirm the policies of our Congress, avoiding that all too soon liquidino the fundamental assumptions of the document Congress voted in the workplace.

should move with determination and responsibility than those who are pushing for a fragmented political system of the proposal of the CGIL. On this, the Government, Confindustria, CISL and UIL, thanks to the absence of a strong interlocutor policy with the world of work, rest their assumptions in order to weaken the only representation of the work in the country.
During those days I was able to appreciate the intervention of the Company that the Directors of Naples Dettori showed the clear rejection of the Pomigliano and non-sharing of the referendum that was proposed to the workers. In reality the bell, because of the infamous relationship created by Fiat between investment and employment is complex argument to support the right of refusal to the signing of an agreement halter, in the face of very strong expectation of employment in related businesses located Fiat.

Too many families hung the presence of an industrial site that speculates on the Rights and Health of Workers. Too poor to the economic reality of the district they live, how many actually affected by southern forms of exploitation of labor and the pressing presence of illegality in every economic activity. With the same strike
environmental hygiene for the area of \u200b\u200bNaples, June 15, we found similar problems. There, too, using the shape of the strike to counter the fragmentation of the integrated cycle of waste, the privatization of parts of the same and the delay of payment of salaries to workers of private consortia. For these reasons I felt too important that our National Coordinator Nicolosi has submitted a statement with the companions of the Campania, to denounce the unacceptable conditions imposed at the table of the meetings held on the setting of production Pomigliano.

for FP CGIL, I inform you that during our discussions, unfortunately without the presence of several comrades of the Secretariat engaged in other locations, we agreed that we can not accept the position of the Fiom is weakened by any suggestion that Voting on the inalienable rights and non-negotiable. On this, then, I also want to reassure you that the statement of the CGIL union, which rejected the agreement and that support for autonomy and Fiom Category handle the dispute, is shared by the secretariat of FP CGIL.
For myself I shall focus on only two assessments that relate to economic and political framework that presides over this affair and the question of the authoritarian tendencies that the ban on strikes would tragically pass on the land. For the first question, I think I get it right if I say that the convergence of strategic interests of a large industrial group (Fiat) and the Government's social and economic line, so intensive, it is quite comparable to the corporate system of Fascist .

Above all, and therein lies the difference with the other agreements, even if sustained, the economic policy of our Country, if we consider that part of the Italian trade with the understanding waiver of important prerogatives, with a further attack on the legal culture of the work even constitutional status, we are in the real exception that employment law also obliges those unions to engage in contractual procedures in contrast with the laws themselves.

The deal, probably, is likely to be disapplied in connection with any litigation.

Even after the war with Italy in arms, he could not accept the ban on strikes and many, including area Catholic trade unionists were murdered by the Nazis in their efforts to fight. On the point about I continue to support the strike, as I always read the report by Di Vittorio for the Constituent Assembly that the ban on strikes, for any category of workers, it is a mutilation of the human personality is incompatible with the principle of freedom of the citizen , and is tied more closely to that of forced labor, which requires a sentence!
In this case there is no democracy, no development, there is no possible prospect of the future. It seems so outrageous that some political forces in Parliament, have opted to forgo one of the tasks of the state, in terms of constitutional guarantees provided for equality between citizens and going to "cheer" for this type of occurrence and social policy.

The ban on strikes so conceived, in fact, form the category of handicapped citizens, deprived of certain rights that are granted to other citizens. So now touches us give substance to solidarity with the workers Fiom and Fiat. We must link our disputes, continuing the struggle for the defense of public employees badly damaged by the financial maneuver, we must recover a strong connection with the metal workers and political forces, for a long-term struggle to defend the legal culture of work of the Republican Constitution and anti-fascist. There are many difficulties. But we have an obligation to try.

Adriano Sgrò

National Coordinator FP-CGIL Area "Company Jobs

Sharp Pain Then Yellow Cm 5 Weeks Pregnant

not defend the Constitution of the trade union

* Louis Blaze

Article 4 L. 77/09 (Reconstruction de L'Aquila), expected to be transferred to the Abruzzo region, property belonging to the State and managed by the Agency for State Property, or by the Ministry of Defence, and entrusted the task to the Region to prepare programs of action for the reconstruction of public buildings with the aim of safeguarding the operational role as the capital of L'Aquila of the Region. Note
In 622 of 10.21.2009 the President of the Abruzzo region calls for a program excerpt, worth 200.85 million euro, to ensure the timely execution of work at 27 properties in the city of L'Aquila, and the Province. A
CIPE decision of 6/11/2009 gives the President of the Region and the resources required for the buildings identified.

Of the 27 properties identified as many as 12 structures refer to law enforcement agencies (including the Fire Brigade), 4 are ecclesiastical structures, two structures are in the Justice, 4 refer to the Abruzzo Region, the Province 2, 1 the City, and a INPS. Always

in the CIPE decision last November, it is said that by 30.06.2010, the President of the Region should put a report on the discussions, since it is particularly important property for the recovery in the region. Perhaps it is not

craft union, but some questions deserve response:

1. Who decided and why, the 27 properties identified priority? There was some level of negotiating with someone about this?
2. The resources required and allocated by the CIPE are actually in the availability of the President of the Region?
3. If resources are available, and if they are employed, such as procedures were put in place for its award of the work? Or, conversely, what procedures will be used for the award of the work?
4. What is the state of the art identified to date on real estate? And it is prepared, as the President of the Region will ensure that fact in his note, a complete picture of program intervention on all public buildings affected by the earthquake in the Crater? You may know this program, or negotiate?

should be of extreme importance to the transparency and control of law on these points, and the negotiation of the interventions, to determine whether resources are being used with priorities consistent with the objectives, if you grasp the need to restore functionality to the regional capital, where the transparency of procedures will parallel the regularity of the employment relationship, when employees of the public sectors are involved ensured a dignified and safe transition, whether the measure is included in a framework organic urban redesign of city functions de L'Aquila.
Most importantly, I believe, should be a priority claim that there is a right of social forces to negotiate with the President of the Region, and Commissioner for work on reconstruction, resources and priorities. To provide transparency, participation and democracy in the reconstruction process. Dare. It means that today there is not.

Louis Blaze

FLAI Secretary-CGIL L'Aquila

Images Of Male Genital Exam

Equality or Discrimination?

* Luca Fusari

Europe requires raising the retirement age of workers in staff, 65 years to repair the severe discrimination (so you want to pass) that is made against them with the current retirement age of 60 years compared to 65 from colleagues.
It 'really?

The EU Directive 79/7/EEC of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment between men and women in matters of social security (ref: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31979L0007:IT:HTML ), art. 7, explicitly allows to keep retirement age differences between men and women.
The Council considered, therefore, fully compatible any differences in the age to retire with the prohibition of discrimination on grounds of sex.
The reason for such differences in the age of retirement is very well known and commonly accepted thing: it is a compensatory measure in the dual role that women usually have to play (work and family). Even if the roles are not as defined as the path of emancipation has led to changes, there are their roles and functions of the woman, and she claims (eg that of the mother) who still carry a load of denser than the average working man's disregard of this would be incontrovertible, yes, discrimination and intolerable injustice.

And this does not change depending on whether you are working class, employed and public employees.
Why the European Court of Justice calling for this increase? Unfortunately for the Court to the pension of civil servants would not have insurance, but pay and how that subject to compliance with the principle of equal treatment under the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU.
pensions of public employees are considered as remuneration, as not falling under the general statutory scheme (managed by INPS), but under a special category (managed by INPDAP).
It 's also true, however, that the Court in not requiring that public employees should retire at 65, but asks that the rules, including the retirement age will be equal for all.

So the EU will not be any indication of the level of equalization that, instead, is chosen independently by each State. Therefore, nothing prevents that pensions are, for example, bring to 63 years for both men and women. But there's more. If the pensions of public employees be placed in the general system of pay that would exceed the interpretation by the Court entered INPDAP pensions, thus being able to maintain differentiation in the retirement age for men and women.
But the feeling is that the governor has taken advantage only to make cash on the shoulders of civil servants. Luca Fusari

FP-CGIL Area Regional Coordinator "Job-Company"

Observable Impairments With Acquired Brain Injury

The annual report of the Bank of Italy on the state of the economy. An indecent proposal

On May 31, Like every year, the Bank of Italy Governor Mario Draghi presented in Rome the "Final Thoughts" on the state of the economy.
On 22 June, the Reiss Romoli, L'Aquila, will be published notes on the economy of Abruzzo.
two events are closely related, as the studies undertaken in the regions used to train and complete the "Report on the state of the economy" and then the Final.
While the notes have a regional significance only technical and analytical, the final considerations, and the same public presentation, taking a clearly political. It is the composition
demonstration the audience of invited and subsequent comments in the press and on television.
This year, in perfect continuity with the past, the day after the show, politicians, trade unions, industry, etc.. were quick to comment on the statement made by Governor extrapolating from his remarks to highlight those elements that fit their own ideas and behaviors.
Thus the right to the Government welcomes the approval for cuts in public spending and welfare, the Centre welcomes the passage on the fight against tax evasion, industrialists take kindly extended an invitation to work for the change in market work, etc..
to seek comfort their actions in "superior entity" that automatically identified for competence and impartiality is in my opinion does not confess symptom perception of right and left unable to demonstrate in practice the goodness of its own policy.
is a bit 'like the little boy to show their peers the truth of his statements, asking the support of the parent or other adult.
In particular, the center-left has always looked with interest to the utterances of the Governor trying to Register as the holder of a policy of rigor and fairness than the right-wing nonsense.
In my opinion this attitude, which is repeated since the time of PCI, is a clear symptom of a perception that the center-left political class can not conflict with the classic instruments of democracy, the vote in Parliament and the mobilization in the country, the pace strong and aggressive right-wing .
The "Final" are only a summary of the annual report with some comments and political addresses.
While the study overall, as well as regional notes, has a purely technical, the utterances of the Governor, from the research objective, but have no political value and neutral.
Indeed, if we analyze the remarks of the various governments over the years, albeit with different nuances depending on the cultural formation of the same, you notice how the information derived therefrom have a constant inspiration monetarist analysis of the state budget, with a tendency to compression of public expenditure and therefore the welfare and constant proximity to places Confindustria .
The Bank of Italy is, or should be independent from political power, but this does not mean that objective in analyzing data certainly is not guided by a country other than the idea of \u200b\u200bwhat we want the left. There are certainly institutions
neutral with respect to the existing class struggle, each figure has its own ideological influences the performance of their functions.
deny this, as is often the center left and also the CGIL, mean abdicating its role, but most have no clear model of society which tend to work in the exercise or protection of the opposition. It means to be in a condition of constant defense against the attack of right, a defense often confused, sometimes contradictory prodrome of certain defeat.
The work of the Bank of Italy has an important significance from the standpoint of analysis, synthesis, policy is certainly not the Governor who has no democratic legitimacy.
him to carry out a task of replacement of our action is childish and suicide.

Egidio Pezzuto Provincial Executive

FISAC-CGIL L'Aquila