Images Of Male Genital Exam

Equality or Discrimination?

* Luca Fusari

Europe requires raising the retirement age of workers in staff, 65 years to repair the severe discrimination (so you want to pass) that is made against them with the current retirement age of 60 years compared to 65 from colleagues.
It 'really?

The EU Directive 79/7/EEC of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment between men and women in matters of social security (ref: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31979L0007:IT:HTML ), art. 7, explicitly allows to keep retirement age differences between men and women.
The Council considered, therefore, fully compatible any differences in the age to retire with the prohibition of discrimination on grounds of sex.
The reason for such differences in the age of retirement is very well known and commonly accepted thing: it is a compensatory measure in the dual role that women usually have to play (work and family). Even if the roles are not as defined as the path of emancipation has led to changes, there are their roles and functions of the woman, and she claims (eg that of the mother) who still carry a load of denser than the average working man's disregard of this would be incontrovertible, yes, discrimination and intolerable injustice.

And this does not change depending on whether you are working class, employed and public employees.
Why the European Court of Justice calling for this increase? Unfortunately for the Court to the pension of civil servants would not have insurance, but pay and how that subject to compliance with the principle of equal treatment under the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU.
pensions of public employees are considered as remuneration, as not falling under the general statutory scheme (managed by INPS), but under a special category (managed by INPDAP).
It 's also true, however, that the Court in not requiring that public employees should retire at 65, but asks that the rules, including the retirement age will be equal for all.

So the EU will not be any indication of the level of equalization that, instead, is chosen independently by each State. Therefore, nothing prevents that pensions are, for example, bring to 63 years for both men and women. But there's more. If the pensions of public employees be placed in the general system of pay that would exceed the interpretation by the Court entered INPDAP pensions, thus being able to maintain differentiation in the retirement age for men and women.
But the feeling is that the governor has taken advantage only to make cash on the shoulders of civil servants. Luca Fusari

FP-CGIL Area Regional Coordinator "Job-Company"